PARSED CONTENT

The website states the following, "Anti-PMA Rhetoric is Wrong; PMA Parts are Valid, Says FAA." I viewed that the web site also stated " The FAA has issued a special bulletin reminding the industry that PMA parts are perfectly valid for use, and that competitors rhetoric questioning FAA-approved PMA parts is contrary to FAA technical findings." They also said " The FAA draws four important conclusions in their SAIB. PMA Parts are Valid Replacement Parts. Installation of PMA Parts Does Not Change the Life Limits for the Other Parts In the Assembly. Unless stated otherwise as a limitation to an STC." The meta header had Rolls-Royce as the first search term. This keyword is followed by aviation parts, helicopter parts, and Honeywell which isn't as important as Rolls-Royce. The other words they uses is FAA-PMA manufacturer. Lycoming is included and might not be understood by search parsers.